🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."