🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our children's youth". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked parliament to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised parents to block their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not establish binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a useful foundation," stated a leading parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "based on robust research".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to dangerous platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to design tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," commented a influential peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, regulation is mostly occurring at the local level due to national inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws mandating adult authorization for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain individuals to mimic this example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Apart from the West, further nations are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

While this worldwide conversation unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers show that governments around the world are less and less willing to wait for platforms to self-regulate.